Latest News

Clues beginning to emerge on asymtomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection
Back in November of 2020, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, I was teaching an in-person microbiology laboratory. One of my students had just been home to see his parents, and they all c…
Read more
Could there maybe be better uses of genetics and probiotics?
Professor Meng Dong and his laboratory have created a probiotic that can metabolize alcohol quickly and maybe prevent some of the adverse effects of alcohol consumption. The scientists cloned a highl…
Read more
ChatGPT is not the end of essays in education
The takeover of AI is upon us! AI can now take all our jobs, is the click-bait premise you hear from the news. While I cannot predict the future, I am dubious that AI will play such a dubious role in…
Read more
Fighting infections with infections
Multi-drug-resistant bacterial infections are becoming more of an issue, with 1.2 million people dying of previously treatable bacterial infections. Scientists are frantically searching for new metho…
Read more
A tale of two colleges
COVID-19 at the University of Wisconsin this fall has been pretty much a non-issue. While we are wearing masks, full in-person teaching is happening on campus. Bars, restaurants, and all other busine…
Read more

News

Ivermectin: fraud or cure for COVID-19?


 

Ivermectin, a drug used to rid mammals of parasites, seems to be showing some utility in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. The paper by Elgazzar et al. showed dramatic results showing a significant improvement in mortality and more rapid recovery. However, a medical student in London, Jack Lawrence, was assigned to analyze the paper by one of his lecturers and he, along with a number of others found serious problems.

The specific errors found are described in an excellent article in The Guardian. One of the most serious concerns is the apparent cloning of records. This was uncovered by Nick Brown who demonstrated at at least 79 records appear to be near copies of one another with a few fields changed, implying the modifications were done to cover up the copying.

Even worse, this paper was included in several meta-analyses on ivermectin, skewing those conclusions. I do think ivermectin warrants further investigation, but at the present time, it is not clear if there is a clinical benefit. Fraudulent studies just make matters worse.